| Sunday, March 19, 2006 | Scranton, PA |
Consultants say the Scranton School District, especially several overcrowded elementary schools, is in desperate need of restructuring. But, for a variety of reasons, school directors have yet to even discuss the findings of a study done last year.
More than four months ago, Scranton School District officials received an in-depth report with recommendations to close certain aging schools and renovate others.
Today, that report is starting to gather dust.
Officials have not yet discussed what action to take on the report. In fact, the only specific proposal being researched is building a new elementary school in West Scranton because of population growth there.
After years of discussion but no action on the possible closing of some of the district's older buildings, the School Board hired Harrisburg-based McKissick Associates for $27,500 to assess the districts' building needs now and into the future.
However, other pressing issues, such as making 10 schools more energy efficient, have put the report on the back burner.
Meanwhile, some elementary schools seem to be straining to hold the growing number of students. At Lincoln-Jackson and John J. Audubon elementary schools, closets, basements and even stair landings have been turned into classroom and office space. Those two schools are candidates for closure under the report findings.
The third leading candidate for closure, John Adams Elementary in Green Ridge, is increasingly becoming a neighborhood school without a neighborhood. Falling enrollment and the high cost of renovating the building are both reasons for recommended closure.
Other options suggested in the report include:
The report also details a plan to build a new elementary school in West Scranton, and has a big supporter in Scranton School District Chief Executive Officer Michael Sheridan.
That option also calls for closing five elementary schools - George Bancroft, Adams, Audubon, Frances Willard and Lincoln-Jackson - and making improvements to the district's remaining 13 schools. The price tag would be about $149.6 million, the report states. About $47 million in state aid would help defray the cost.
Mr. Sheridan has said several Realtors are looking for land in West Scranton that might be suitable for the project but he has not heard from them about possibilities.
School Board members Todd O'Malley, Todd Hartman and President Brian Jeffers all believe West Scranton is the area that needs the most immediate attention, because of the rapid population growth. Lincoln-Jackson Elementary, about 23,235 square feet, is so overcrowded that the district rents space from a church to hold first- and second-grade classes, as well as some special programs.
The population growth in South Scranton is also a concern, they said. Both Whittier and John Kennedy elementary schools are at capacity.
"Right now, we don't have room in South and West," Mr. Hartman said.
Mr. O'Malley, the former president of the board, is also concerned about the overcrowding at Whittier and Lincoln-Jackson.
"We need a new elementary in the city, possibly two," he said.
He added that the School Board has not met to discuss where new elementary schools should or could be built, and declined to elaborate on his opinion.
Former Scranton School District Superintendent John R. Williams agrees that building a new school in West Scranton deserves scrutiny.
"West has got some old buildings, some small buildings," he said. "But if you construct a new building there, you have to find a central location. And I don't know if that's going to be possible."
West Scranton houses some of the district's oldest schools Marshall was built in 1889 and Lincoln-Jackson, which is actually just an annex of the main building that burned down, was built in 1909.
Despite the pressing need to address the building problems detailed in the McKissick report, School Board members are first dealing with making schools more energy efficient, a problem also detailed in the report.
"We really need to get the energy efficiency changes straightened out," said Frank Brazill, School Board member and chairman of the building and grounds committee. "Then we can focus on the McKissick report."
Last month, the School Board voted to make Neil Armstrong, John F. Kennedy, McNichols Plaza, William Prescott, Charles Sumner and Robert Morris elementary schools, Northeast, South and West intermediate schools and West High School more energy efficient by converting from steam heat, replacing windows and upgrading other facilities. The changes could save the district $10.5 million over the next 15 years.
The changes are in line with a portion of the 338-page McKissick report recommendations which details the need to improve or replace heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems in some schools.
"Increased energy costs as well as building code requirements for indoor air quality are a challenge with the number of antiquated HVAC systems," McKissick Associates President Vern McKissick wrote in the report. "The district's master plan must include substantial investment in upgrading or replacing HVAC systems."
However, the impending closure of Community Central Energy Corp., which provides steam heat at Northeast and three other district buildings, has muddied the plans for improvements. Community Central Energy Corp. recently announced a rate increase of 68 percent, retroactive to March 1. That follows a January increase of 41 percent.
Now the School Board might have to include converting heating systems at John Adams and the district's administration building, the fates of which are still up in the air because of the options detailed in the report. One option in the McKissick report includes moving administration offices into Adams, as well as building a new Marshall elementary school in West Scranton, at a cost of $140 million. To accommodate moving the administration offices into Adams, students there would be relocated to Bancroft and Prescott elementary schools, the report recommends.
East Scranton Intermediate, which is not in use, also uses steam heat. If the report option to reopen that building as an elementary school is followed, the School Board would have to convert that building as well The cost of conversion, as estimated in the McKissick report, is about $959,000.
School Board members agree that it would be safe to assume that the 10 buildings listed for energy efficiency improvements will not close. Most of those were built or renovated in the last 40 years, and an received "good" or "fair" building ratings in the McKissick report.
Discussions on the report findings could begin as early as next month, Mr. O'Malley said. However, Mr. Jeffers said he thinks it might take a little longer than that, possibly a couple of months.
Before discussing which options to pursue at least a few School Board members said they think the district should explore the idea of redrawing school boundary lines to relieve some of the overcrowding. Students could then be redistributed to other schools that have room to house them.
"It's one thing we should be looking at," said board member Kathleen McGuigan. "For us to try to guess where the population will grow is crazy. We need to know what's going on right now."
A couple of board members are leery of moving quickly the report findings because of the controversy generated by construction of the new Scranton High School in 2001.
"It took us 30 years to build that high school," Mr. O'Malley said. "Everyone is gun shy and wants to make sure what we put on the table is acceptable to the community."
Sources: McKissick Report, Standard & Poor's School Matters 2004 report, Pennsylvania Department of Education
NOTE: Students:teacher is ration of students per teacher.
Eric Toffey / Staff Artist
The McKissick Associates report on the weaknesses and strengths of Scranton School District buildings includes an overall assessment and ranking. Rankings are based on the condition of each of the district's 20 buildings. To rank buildings, Vern McKissick and his employees looked at each building's site, structure, interior, food service, energy efficiency; heating, ventilating and air conditioning, plumbing, electrical, fire service and technology. Each school was given a report card listing its key needs and "grade point average" - one being "poor" and four being "excellent". Following are assessments of the lowest ranked schools:
Address: Academy Street and South Hyde Park Avenue
Rank: 20
GPA: 1.23
Built: 1909
Key needs: Installation of new windows, doors and roof, replacement of heating, plumbing, communications and electrical systems and needs extensive building code upgrades.
Renovation cost: $2.8 million
Other: Right now, the school district rents space from a church a few blocks away to house their first- and second-grade students because they have run out of space in the main building.
Address: 528 Quincy Avenue
Rank: 19
GPA: 1.39
Built: 1927
Key needs: Conversion from steam heat, upgrades to roof and doors, installation of a sprinkler system, replacement of plumbing, electrical and communication systems.
Renovation cost: $4.7 million
Other: The school was closed three years ago and currently sits empty.
Address: North Lincoln Avenue and Oram Street
Rank: 18
GPA: 1.41
Built: 1889
Key needs: Upgrades to windows, roof and doors, replacement of the heating, plumbing, electrical and communication systems.
Renovation cost: $5.1 million
Other: This is the oldest school in the district. An addition was built in 1926 and a complete renovation was done in 1956. The building was retrofitted with a sprinkler system in the 1970s. It has the highest estimated renovation cost.
Address: 1801 Mulberry Street
Rank: 17
GPA: 1.55
Built: 1910
Key needs: Replacement of windows, roof and heating and cooling systems.
Renovation cost: $4.7 million
Other: The site is limited in expansion possibilities. A major renovation was done in 1962.
Address: 927 Capouse Avenue
Rank: 16
GPA: 1.56
Built: 1931
Key needs: Conversion from steam heat, replacement of electrical and communication systems and needs to be in compliance with building code measures.
Renovation cost: $3.6 million
Other: The building is being underutilized in terms of enrollment versus capacity. It is located in an area of the city zoned for industrial use.
Three Scranton elementary schools, Lincoln-Jackson, John Adams and John J. Audubon, are repeat contenders for closure in several options detailed in the McKissick Associates report on district building conditions. The reasons are as diverse as the schools. Lincoln-Jackson is straining to house its growing student body. The neighborhood around Adams is disappearing. Audubon is relatively landlocked, making expansion difficult. Times-Tribune Staff Writer Erin L. Nissley spent time at each school to see how teachers and students overcome obstacles detailed in the report.
A hanging skeleton did not phase the 30 second-graders in the John Adams Elementary School Science lab.
The plastic model showing major human organs, however, was a different story.
A chorus of "eeewww" filled the lab as teacher Joanne McCarthy pointed out the brain.
Teacher Bob Selemba quickly distracted the grossed-out students by rapping his knuckles on his own skull. "Are your skulls hard or soft?" he asked.
Dressed in white lab coats that hung almost to their ankles, the students tapped their own skulls before answering "Hard!"
The lab is a new addition to Adams, but creating it meant moving the teacher's lounge to a small corner of the room. The lab/lounge is just one example of how the building's rooms have been reconstructed to meet modern education needs.
Built in 1931, Adams is an imposing brick structure that still has some old-fashioned accoutrements. Tall glass-and wood cabinets are built into the walls on the third floor. An old clock that chimes on the hour and a manual bell system still hang on the wall inside Principal Sally Henry's office. The small gymnasium in the middle of the building is a rarity in schools this old, and its existence is one of the school's points of pride.
Its biggest problem, however, is that it's a neighborhood school without a neighborhood.
More and more light industrial businesses are moving into that part of town, and fewer and fewer families with young children are around. This year, 92 of the school's 247 student are bused to Adams each day.
"The neighborhood is no longer there," said Michael Sheridan, chief executive officer of the Scranton School District. "The students who go there can easily be absorbed by other schools."
Those other schools include George Bancroft, Robert Morris and William Prescott.
Parents take issue with the idea of closing the school, though, calling it a place where everyone feels like family. Parent Amber Bagg, who attended Adams and has a daughter in first grade and a son in preschool there, worries about the student-teacher ratio if Adams students were relocated.
"The kids who need extra attention won't get it," Mrs. Bagg said. "They get that here, because the classes are small."
Not many teachers know the value of small classes better than preschool teachers like Mary Ann Smith. Snack time with the 15 or so students in her morning class could have easily teetered into chaos without her vigilance and that of teacher's aide Paula Harte.
As the students sat at tables munching their snacks, one student calmly got Mrs. Harte's attention and pointed to the floor.
"I dropped my yogurt," he said. He picked up the plastic cup and looked at the pink and orange mess next to his chair. "That's disgusting!"
Snack time also brought with it opportunities to go over earlier lessons. As snack time wound down, Mrs. Smith and Mrs. Harte walked around the tables with a big plastic tub of animal crackers.
"Count with me," Mrs. Smith said to each student as she doled out the treats. "One, two, three, four. That's right. Four."
Ms. Henry finds it difficult to believe Adams is in a neighborhood in decline because she sees more younger students enroll each year.
"Smaller schools enable children to get the best education," she said. "But the School Board has to make the best decision for the whole district. I understand that."
On a chilly morning, a spirited game of tag is going on in the side yard of John J. Audubon Elementary School.
Students' shouts ring out over Mulberry Street and Colfax Avenue. A teacher laughs along with the children, who chase each other madly and shriek when they're tagged. No one notices the cracks in the sidewalk or the brisk snap of winter hanging in the air.
Inside the school, a kindergarten class sings along with the music teacher and a couple of kids hurry down the halls. One child gives Principal Mary Ann Taffera a big hug before scooting upstairs.
"This school really fits the neighborhood it's in," Mrs. Taffera said, "and it's small, so you know who eats breakfast, who needs clothes. Especially in this part of the city; we need that familiarity."
The neighborhood around Audubon has been experiencing a resurgence recently. Right now, there are enough students to support two classes in each grade, as well as two preschool classes. Nearly 300 students attend Audubon this year, and Mrs. Taffera says she's pretty sure that number will continue to increase. Just a few years ago, the student body barely reached 200.
With the growing student body; however, comes the problem of where to put them all.
Both the music and art teachers visit classes because there's no space to create their own classrooms. Half the library has been converted into a classroom. Even the building's basement has been renovated into classroom space.
While Lenore Krieger's kindergarten classroom was a little darker and danker than classrooms on the first and second floors, students' drawings and bins of brightly colored toys brightened the atmosphere and mood.
The 20 kindergartners were oblivious to the creaking floorboards of a classroom above and the sounds of a lively lesson from the class next door. Their attention was focused on their teacher, who had asked them to think of places they liked to go after school.
The sense of community is part of the education at Audubon, said grandparent Karen Lyons, who walks her grandson to school each day.
"Because it's a small, neighborhood school, the teachers know all the kids," she said. "The kids know all the teachers. You'd lose the community if they close it down."
Still, with the school bursting at its seams, some district officials question how they'll be able to relieve the space issues at a school that has so little space around it.
The school is more or less landlocked, pointed out former School Board President Todd O'Malley. Community Medical Center is to its right. Nay Aug Park is behind it. Just down the street is the University of Scranton. Knocking down homes to make way for an addition is not plausible. But, Mr. O'Malley said, any of those entities might want to buy the lot on which the school sits.
Michael Sheridan, chief executive officer for the Scranton School District, said he thinks there might be a way to put a four-classroom addition onto Audubon to relieve pressure.
"Nay Aug is revitalized, people have moved back into the neighborhood," he said. "I don't see us closing Audubon."
Small tile squares became a math lesson for Maria Lameo's fourth-graders at Lincoln-Jackson Elementary School.
The students were learning about measurements, and Ms. Lameo challenged them to figure out how she had the home improvement store clerk cut a piece of shower-tile board to make enough for everyone in the class.
"All of you who ask me when we'll use this, here's a way," she told her students.
With her prompting, they figured out the area of the large board and how she had calculated the measurements of the smaller squares so' there were enough for the whole class.
That sort of creative thinking is the norm at Lincoln-Jackson. Teachers and administrators have to use their imaginations to create classroom space at their too-small school.
Art teacher Maria Lozada pushes a cart piled high with beads, feathers, crayons and half-finished art projects from classroom to classroom because there's no space for an art room. Principal Ann McDonough's office is in a:. Converted closet. The cafeteria also doubles as a gym, a music room and area for after-school programs.
At the annex a few blocks away, first- and second-graders sit in classrooms separated by a flimsy rolling divider. As teacher Rosemary Phillips went over a list of vocabulary words with her second-graders, the math lesson from the class next door drifted over. A group of students worked on reading skills in a staircase landing, ignoring the occasional teacher passing by on trips up and down the steps.
"Every ounce of space is being used," Ms. McDonough said. "We do what we need to do with what we have. But at this point, we've run out of space."
The lack-of-space issue is the driving force behind the idea to close Lincoln-Jackson, said the district's chief executive officer, Michael Sheridan. It would cost almost $2.8 million to renovate the school, and that doesn't include building an addition to relieve the space crunch.
The tight quarters don't seem to bother many Lincoln-Jackson parents.
Parent Ann McDonald worries if the school closes and students are relocated, the individual attention her daughter gets there will be lost.
"What's going to happen if they put her in some big school?" Mrs. McDonald asked. "It'll be like throwing them into a jungle. They'll be scared."
In the past two decades as principal, Ms. McDonough has weathered several School Board discussions about closing the school. She's realistic about the school's structural shortcomings, but said she and her staff are dedicated to their students and the community.
"I don't get excited about it because it's out of my control," she said. "If it's planned correctly, a new school could be a good thing."